Taxpayers United for the Michigan Constitution, Inc. v. City of Detroit
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In these consolidated appeals, plaintiffs contest the retroactive application of the revived City Utility Users Tax Act, MCL 141.1151 et seq.; MSA 5.3188(251) et seq., as specifically outlined by the Legislature in 1990 PA 100, MCL 141.1158; MSA 5.3188(258). In particular, plaintiffs contend the retroactive revival of the tax violates the Due Process Clauses of the federal and state constitutions, the Separation of Powers Clause of the state constitution, and Const 1963, art 9, § 31, commonly known as the Headlee Amendment. We affirm.
This appeal can be traced to the case of Ace Tex Corp v…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wylie v. City Commission of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Armco Steel Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Moser v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Metro Homes, Inc. v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Detroit v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- General Motors Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc v. City of HamtramckMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Attorney General v. Michigan Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Ammex, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.