State v. Pfeifer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
■ Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Fillmore county, Page, J., presiding. cited State v. Schmail, 25 Minn. 370, and State v. Hanley, 25 Minn. 429.
1Opinion of the CourtBeery, J.
The defendant was indicted under Gen. St. c* 16, for selling malt liquor without license, in the city of Rush-ford, Fillmore county. The city charter (Sp. Laws 1869, c. 2,) declares, in article 4, § 3, that the city council “shall have-the exclusive right to license persons vending, dealing in or disposing of spirituous, vinous, malt or fermented liquors within the limits of said city; and persons so licensed shall not be required to obtain a license from the board of county commissioners, and shall not be prosecuted for selling, bartering or disposing of spirituous, vinous, fermented or malt…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. SchmailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. NolanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- State v. WheelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880