Cargill Commission Co. v. Swartwood

*12On Petition Fok Rehearing.

On May 2, 1924, the following opinion was filed:

Stone, J.

Respondents’ petition for rehearing is denied, but its tenor is of that commendable character which deserves this additional comment.

Counsel for respondents fear that the opinion, as it stands, will be considered as overruling, in part at least, Wyman, Partridge & Co. v. Bible, 150 Minn. 26, 184 N. W. 45; Bradshaw v. Barber, 125 Minn. 479, 147 N. W. 650, and Lehigh Coal & Iron Co. v. Scallen, 61 Minn. 68, 63 N. W. 245. In those cases the question of the reasonableness, in some aspect, of credit extended under a…