Nayar v. Nayar
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The award of temporary maintenance was properly based upon the statutory factors (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6]), taking into account plaintiffs reasonable needs, defendant’s financial ability, the parties’ prior lavish standard of living, and the great discrepancy between their financial positions (see, Baker v Baker, 120 AD2d 374; Lasry v Lasry, 180 AD2d 488). It was also within the court’s discretion to award interim counsel fees (Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]), without a showing of need or requiring that plaintiff dispose of her only assets (see, DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- DeCabrera v. Cabrera-RoseteNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Lasry v. LasryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Commissioner of Social Services v. Raymond S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Baker v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Hills v. HillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ayoub v. AyoubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Iarocci v. MichaelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Matisoff v. DobiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996