Legal Opinion

State v. Wicket

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Erom tbe Allen Criminal Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

The indictment is as follows, omitting its title:

“ Tbe grand jurors for tbe county of Allen, and State of Indiana, upon tbeir oatb, charge and present, that, on *439the seventh day of October, A. D. 1876, Samuel Wickey and Martin Wickey, at said county of Allen and State aforesaid, they not being then and there licensed, according to the law of the State of Indiana in force at the time, to sell intoxicating liquors, unlawfully sold to George Smenner intoxicating liquors in a less quantity than a quart at a time, to wit, the quantity of two gills, at and for, the price of ten cents, to be then and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burke v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Shafer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SchweiterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Knopf v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Plunkett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. State v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. State v. WickeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API