Legal Opinion

Norman Gradsky v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 5, 1973No. 73-2152Published

1Per curiam

It is hereby ordered that this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction since the judgment sought to be appealed is not final as to all of the appellant’s claims. 1 See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292; Rule 54(b), F.R.Civ.P.; Graham v. Cole, 5th Cir. 1973, 483 F.2d 255; Jones v. Riggsby, 5th Cir. 1973, 475 F.2d 760; United States v. Crow et al., 5th Cir. 1973, 474 F.2d 200.

Dismissed.

1. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(e)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jesse Coy Kimbrough v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. Crow, Pope and Land Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Zella Mae Graham, Etc. v. Robert R. Cole, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  4. Ottis Mayo Jones v. J. D. Riggsby, Associate Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API