Legal Opinion

Seilhamer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1988No. Appeal No. 1434 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge McGinley,

Russell W. Seilhamer (Seilhamer) áppeals from a decision of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a decision of the Referee to suspend Workmens Compensation Benefits pursuant to Section 413 of The Pennsylvania Workmens Compensation Act (Act),1 77 P.S. §772. We affirm.

Seilhamer was employed by Berwind Railway Service Company (Employer) as a car repairman on May 11, 1982, when he suffered a work-related fracture of *412the right hand. As a result of the injury, Seilhamer began receiving benefits pursuant to a Notice of Compensation Payable. On March 17,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kirkwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Carmen Paliotta General Construction & Federal Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Caplan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Pettigrew v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API