Legal Opinion

Heacock v. Durand

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1866PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. John M. Wilson, Chief Justice, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lawrence

This was a bill in chancery, brought by the appellees against the appellants, for the purpose of setting aside, as fraudulent, a voluntary assignment made by the appellants, for the benefit of their creditors, some of whom were preferred. The court below held the assignment fraudulent, and made a decree sot-ting it aside and appointing a receiver. The assignment contained a clause authorizing the assignee “ first to pay and disburse all the just and reasonable costs, charges and expenses and commissions attending the due execution of these presents, and the carrying into effect the trusts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nichols v. . McEwenNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Nelson v. PinegarIllinois Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blow v. GageIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Bachmann v. Supreme Lodge Knights & Ladies of HonorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  3. Benjamin v. Manufacturers Terminal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1927
  4. Durand v. LordIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Yates v. ThompsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API