Carvill v. Mirror Films, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, third district, in favor of defendant, entered upon the decision of the court of a question of law arising upon a set of stipulated facts.
1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.
The stipulation discloses that plaintiff was employed by defendant for one year from January 1, 1916, at a weekly compensation of $100; that he was at all times ready and willing but that he began to work on January seventeenth and continued to February fifth — three weeks — for which he received $300; and that on or about the latter date he was discharged. On February fourteenth he made an assignment to one J ones of ‘ ‘ All that certain claim and demand which I have against the Mirror Films, Inc., for damages for the breach of its agreement of hiring with me, this assignment covering all…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Chapman v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Risley v. . Phenix Bank of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Field v. . the Mayor, C. of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carvill v. Mirror Films, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917