In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Oakley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the contestants, William. H. Oakley and another* from portions of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Yew York, entered in said Surrogate’s Court on the 29th day of May, 1901, settling the accounts of Charles S. Oakley, as executor, etc., of William H. Oakley, deceased, and directing payment of the net income of the trust estate of said testator to Louise S, Berlin.
1Opinion of the Court
O’Brien, J.:
tlpoñ the accounting of the executor of William H. Oakley, who died in Yew York city January 24, 1893, leaving a last will and testament, the question arose whether under such will his daughter Louise S. Berlin, who was a widow and living with the testator at the time, of his death, was entitled to receive the entire income of •the estate, or whether it should be divided between her and her brothers and sister, William H. Oakley, Charles S. Oakley and Clara Meyerkort and the son of her deceased sister Kate Oakley Brown, Oakley K. Brown. Although Louise S. Berlin was married when…
2Cited by8 opinions
- People v. WeinstockNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1912
- Mott v. ScanlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Smith v. Grand High Court of Jericho of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Douglass v. Board of Foreign Missions of the Presbyterian Church of AmericaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- In re the Estate of MarshallNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.