Legal Opinion

Kingsland v. Mayor of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1887Published

Appeal by tbe defendants from a judgment entered upon the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

Daniels, J :

The object of the action is the recovery of damages for discontinuing a bulk-head on the preceding' Westerly water line of the city of New York. It has been brought by the plaintiff as- the surviving executor and trustee under the' Will of Daniel C, Kingsland, deceased, and the bulk-head in controversy adjoined Charlton street on the north and extended southerly 101 feet or thereabouts, on the westerly line of West street. The rights of the plaintiff as they have been presented in the action have' been derived under two deeds, one of which was made by the mayor, etc., of the city…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Story v. . New York Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Langdon v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Henderson v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Dermott v. . the StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Board of Commissioners of Pilots v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API