Legal Opinion

Philip D. Kyle v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 2016No. 20A03-1507-CR-969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PYLE, Judge.

Statement of the Case

[1] Philip D. Kyle (“Kyle”) appeals his two convictions for Class C felony child molesting. 1 On appeal, he argues that the trial court abused its discretion when it: (1) .admitted an audiotape of phone conversations he had with the. victim’s mother from jail; and . (2) allowed the victim’s mother to testify that she was convicted of assisting a criminal as a result of trying to convince the victim to change his story. He asserts that the phone conversations were inadmissible under Indiana Evidence Rule 404(b) and that the testimony was inadmissible under…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. James N. Barnes (93-6120) and Doyle R. Pate, Jr. (93-6149)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. Allen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Camm v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Shane v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Ingram v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas King v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Anthony Hudgins v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Jason C. Amonett v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Jody Michael Brooks v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Jonathan Rivera v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API