AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. OF HARTFORD, CONN. v. Curran
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
JOYNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut (“AICHC”) instituted this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 seeking a declaratory judgment that it is not obligated to defend or indemnify Defendant James J. Curran, Jr. for an accident involving a 1979 Mercedes 6-9 sedan. Defendant Curran, in .turn, counter-claimed for declaratory relief in the form of an order decreeing that AICHC is so obligated. Following Judge Gawthrop’s denial of the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, this matter was heard non-jury before the undersigned on…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Aetna Casualty & Surety InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- St. Paul Fire And Marine Insurance Company v. Barbara LewisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brink v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. HinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Petrosky v. Allstate Fire & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- DEPASQUALE v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- FERRA AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, INC. v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONGON - SYNDICATE 2001 AMLDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.