Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Goldwater

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 2, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

In this accounting proceeding there is controversy respecting whether a premium paid on the redemption of certain bonds is to be credited to principal or to income account. The bonds were called at 105 and accrued interest. The court holds that the interest from the last coupon date to the date of redemption properly belongs in income account and that the premium paid for the privilege of redemption properly belongs in capital account. (Whittemore v. Beekman, 2 Dem. 275, 285; Scovel v. Roosevelt, 5 Redf. 121, 124, 128.) Here the court holds that the *815premium paid constitutes a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scovel v. RooseveltNew York Surrogate's Court · 1881

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Luery v. AddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API