Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Black

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 7, 1929No. 12254PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNKLIN, J. L. X

Hawkins, defendant in the court below, has appealed from a judgment in favor of J. R. Black, plaintiff, for services rendered by the plaintiff as an attorney at law for the defendant, for the sum of $412.87, principal, and $56, accrued interest, aggregating $468.87.

There is no merit in the contention that it was incumbent upon the plaintiff to allege and prove that he had complied with the requirements of the statutes regulating the practice of law in this state, as a prerequisite to his right to recover for the services alleged to have been rendered. There is no analogy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Poe v. Continental Oil & Cotton Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Marshall v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Swift v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Fowler v. MorrillTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Texas Employers' Ass'n v. DrummondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mabry v. PriesterTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Taliba C. Johnson v. Gregory Luchin Individually and D/B/A Luchin & Sons Construction, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API