Legal Opinion

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 9, 1990No. 88 CIV. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge:

This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement in the action commenced by the plaintiffs United States of America (the “Government”) against the defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters (the “IBT”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board (the “GEB”) embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (the “Consent Decree”). The remedial provisions in the Consent Decree provided for three Court-appointed officials, the Independent Administrator to oversee the remedial provisions, an Investigations Officer to bring disciplinary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. Joint Council 73 v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  3. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  4. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API