Legal Opinion

Hill v. McCoy

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1905No. 11PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Plaintiff brought the action to recover commission as broker for the sale of defendant’s land. The cause was tried by the court without a jury and plaintiff had judgment,, from which defendant appeals on bill of exceptions.

The court found that plaintiff and defendant on September 22, 1900, entered into a contract by which plaintiff was “authorized to and agreed to act as broker to bargain for and procure a purchaser for 47 acres of land with the improvements thereon, at that time owned by said defendant, ’ ’ known as the Abbey ranch; that it was further agreed “that if said ranch was sold to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Sussdorff v. . SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Lloyd v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Wylie v. . Marine National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Fitzpatrick v. UnderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Worley v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Haun v. RosenmayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Knight v. BentelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API