State v. Martinosky

¶ 1 Ambrose Paul Martinosky (Martinosky) appeals from the judgment entered by the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, on a jury verdict finding him guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) and criminal endangerment. We affirm.

¶2 Martinosky raises the following issues:

¶3 1. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in admitting Martinosky’s confession as evidence of the offense of DUI?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in refusing Martinosky’s proposed jury instruction on negligent endangerment as a lesser included offense of criminal endangerment?

BACKGROUND

¶5 At…