Moore v. Brasel

Johnson, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). It will be seen from the foregoing Statement of facts that appellant is a subsequent creditor seeking to set aside a conveyance made some years prior to the creation of his debt.

This court held in Jenkins v. Smith, 170 Ark. 806, 281 S. W. 377: “In order for a subsequent creditor to secure the avoidance of a voluntary conveyance, the intention to defraud existing or subsequent creditors must be proved by the facts and circumstances surrounding the transaction, and the presumption of such intention -will not be indulged from the execution of a voluntary…