Legal Opinion

Stuckey v. Carleton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Forcible entry and detainer. Title. Actions. Before Judge Lawson. ’Wilkinson County. At Chambers. March 19, 1880. To the report contained in the decision it is only necessary to add that Stuckey brought his action of forcible entry and detainer against Carleton, and on the trial the jury found for defendant. Plaintiff petitioned for a certiorari, which was refused, and he excepted.

1Opinion of the Court

Crawford, Justice.

This case is brought by the plaintiff in error before this court upon the refusal of the judge below to sanction a petition for certiorari.

The grounds upon which he sought this writ were:

1. That upon the trial of the case, which was one of forcible entry and detainer, the justice allowed the defendant, while testifying as a witness, to relate what Stuckey, the party suing out the warrant, had-told him, *216the defendant, in reference to the advice which was given him by his alleged counsel, Chambers and Lindsey, and then to repeat what each one of those parties told him, the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API