Legal Opinion
City of Miami v. First Nat. Bank of St. Petersburg, Fla.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 16, 1932No. 6287PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
The city of Miami brought, its bill alleging: That on June 4, 1930, it deposited; in the First National Bank of Miami for collection a cheek for $5,000, payable to its order, drawn by the County Finance Corporation on the First National Bank of St. Peters-burg. That it was indorsed by the Miami. bank for collection, and sent in accordance-with the usual and regular course of banking business to the First National Bank of' Tampa, Fla., which in the same regular course-of banking business sent it to the St. Petersburg bank for collection and remittance. That the St.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Commercial Bank of Pa. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Schuyler v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Keyes v. Paducah & IR Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Cumberland Portland Cement Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953
- Wisdom v. KeenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Hunt Foods, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Jefferson Standard Life Ins. v. WisdomCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.