Legal Opinion

Fellner v. Zuckerberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1952PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant’s employment having been terminated without fault on his part, whether the plaintiff is entitled to the return of any part of the fee paid for the conduct of the action to its conclusion, depends on the intention of the parties when the payment was made, to be determined from the receipt and all the surrounding circumstances. These issues should be explored fully.

The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Hoestadter and Schreiber, JJ., concur in Per Curiam memorandum ; Hecht, J., dissents and votes for reversal of the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Petition of Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis & CohenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. Reisch & Klar v. SadofskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Jacobson v. SassowerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1983
  4. Jacobson v. SassowerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982
  5. Sherrier v. RichardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API