Legal Opinion

Collier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 18, 2003No. 1D02-0480Published

1Per curiam

Appellant, Tracy L. Collier, contends that the trial court committed fundamental error when it failed to instruct on the element of intent in charging the jury on the crime of escape. While the escape instruction given deviated from the standard jury instruction by omitting the phrase “intending to avoid lawful confinement,” we conclude that the court adequately instructed the jury regarding the intent element of escape by including the phrase “by leaving without permission” to modify the term “escape” in the third section of the instruction. See Howell v. State, 503 So.2d 409 (Fla. 1st DCA…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ault v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Howell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API