Derfner Management, Inc. v. Lenhill Realty Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*435On appeal, defendants argue that the motion court abused its discretion in limiting discovery to a seven year period measured from the allegations in the complaint. Defendants contend that the statute of limitations was an inappropriate tool to limit discovery because of plaintiffs status as a fiduciary, with a duty to account. Defendants also argue that the pre-2004 records are a part of, and shed light on, the self-dealing carried out by plaintiff within the statutory period and, thus, are relevant to this action. However, defendants failed to establish that they could not, with reasonable…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MATTER OF COHEN v. Cocoline Prods.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Bohrer v. International Banknote Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Lucas-Plaza Housing Development Corp. v. CoreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Endervelt v. SladeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kaye v. Merchant Factors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026