Legal Opinion

Norton Company v. Harrelson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 27, 1965No. 6 Div. 150PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

In this case the evidence is that appellant Norton manufactured and placed upon the market a grinding wheel which was purchased by the plaintiff Harrelson’s employer. The wheel was designed to be affixed to a grinding machine and used to grind down metal welds. Plaintiff’s employer purchased approximately 100 of these wheels each year and the one in question had been placed on the machine earlier during the morning of the accident. It was used for a few minutes by the plaintiff’s coworker before the plaintiff began to use it in the manner shown to be usual and customary and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Trowbridge v. Abrasive Co. Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. Defore v. Bourjois, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Zesch v. the Abrasive Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  4. Altorfer Bros. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Company v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Atkins v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. RodgersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Meadows v. Coca-Cola Bottling, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. SCM Corp. v. LettererIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API