Baker v. Judges of Ulster Common Pleas
New York Supreme Court
1Per curiam
As the judgment was contemporaneous with the discharge under the insolvent act, the defendant had no opportunity to plead his discharge. (2 Caines, 380. 1 Johns. Cases, 133.) He might have sought relief by an audita querela; but it is usual to grant the same relief on motion, and the rule of the court below was properly granted. The motion must be denied.
Rule refused.
2Cited by17 opinions
- Dresser v. BrooksNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Cook v. SparksTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- Mallory v. Norton & ScottNew York Supreme Court · 1856
- Spafford v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- West Philadelphia Bank v. . GerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.