Legal Opinion

Baker v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided August 11, 2023No. 4:22-cv-00077Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MITCHELL B., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 22-cv-00077-SH ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff Mitchell B. seeks judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying his claim for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (the “Act”),

42 U.S.C. §§ 401

- 434. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to proceed before a United…

2Cases cited16 opinions

Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
Danny CLIFTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.