Legal Opinion

Verney Corporation v. Peterborough

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 31, 1963No. 5011PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

On April 1, 1955, the plaintiff, Verney Corporation, owned and operated a textile finishing plant in the town of Peter-borough engaged in dyeing and finishing cloth which had been woven at other textile mills owned by the plaintiff in Brunswick, Maine and Manchester, New Hampshire. The cloth received by the plaintiff in the unfinished stage was known to the trade as “greige cloth” or “greige goods.” Other cloth, received from its Manchester mill, was finished “marquisette” or curtain material. The plaintiff finishes goods only on order.

*370The plaintiff’s taxable property on April 1, 1955,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aeronautical Commun. Eq., Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade Cty.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. Pelham Plaza v. Town of PelhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Indian Head National Bank v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Shannon v. FosterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  5. In re Appeal of AMP, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API