Niermeyer v. Doyle (In Re Doyle)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ELLIOTT, Bankruptcy Judge:
Niermeyer appeals from an order dismissing her complaint seeking a declaration that the debtor’s liability to her was not dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. Section 523(a)(5). Niermeyer obtained a non-marital support judgment in state court at the termination of a lengthy relationship with Doyle. The bankruptcy judge found that it was not the intent of Congress that non-marital support, or “palimony,” be included under section 523(a)(5) as a nondischargeable debt. We affirm.
FACTS
Kathleen Niermeyer and James Doyle lived together for five years. Niermeyer alleges…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Kelson v. City of SpringfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- E. Deborah Stout v. Elliott PrusselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Bell v. Bell (In Re Bell)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leslie v. Hart (In Re Hart)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
- Hill v. Hale (In Re Hill)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
- McHenry v. McHenry (In Re McHenry)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
- Excell v. Magee (In Re Magee)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
- Brown v. Vali-Chek (In Re Brown)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1989