Legal Opinion

White Factors, Inc. v. Friedman

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJambs D. Hopkins, J.

The plaintiff in an action to foreclose a mortgage moves for summary judgment. After the service of the motion, the defendants Friedman served an amended answer as of right. That answer raised the defense that the plaintiff prior to the institution of the action entered judgment against the defendants for the debt secured by the mortgage, and that execution has not been issued, or returned wholly or partly unsatisfied. The answer further raised the defense and counterclaim of usury, alleging that the mortgage was given to secure a sum of money advanced by the plaintiff to the defendants, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dwan v. MassareneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Dudley v. Congregation of the Third Order of St. FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. O'Connor-Sullivan, Inc. v. OttoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  4. White v. WielandtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. White v. WielandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Contemporary Mortgage Bankers, Inc. v. High Peaks Base Camp, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1993
  2. Goddard v. JohnsonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
  3. D'Agostino v. Wheel Inn, Inc., New York County Courts1970
  4. Stern v. Itkin Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Tolmach v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API