Legal Opinion

People v. Gonzalez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1979PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

All three preconditions to the application of CPL 60.25 (subd 2) having been met, the testimony of Officer Moroney confirming the pretrial identification of appellant by the witness Grant was properly admissible at trial (see People v Nival, 33 NY2d 391). Appellant apparently concedes both that the identifying witness "observed the person claimed by the people to be the defendant” at the crime scene (CPL 60.25, subd 1, par [a], cl [i]) and that he was "unable at [trial] to state, on the basis of present…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. GruttolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. NivalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. CummingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. People v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. People v. HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API