Legal Opinion · Dissent

Winfield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1956No. 27,770Published

1DissentDavidson, Judge

That the jury commissioners, in drawing the jury panel from which was selected the jury that tried and convicted the appellant, arbitrarily and intentionally failed to select and refused to select or consider women for jury service on that panel is not disputed.

In sustaining the action of the trial court in overruling appellant’s challenge to the array, my brethren do so upon the proposition that appellant — being a male person and not a member of the class which was discriminated against — could not complain of a denial of equal protection to women in the selection of the jury. In other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Ballard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Fay v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Fann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Logan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API