Legal Opinion

Bronner v. Frauenthal

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided April 15, 1861Published

Appeal from adjustment of costs. On the trial of the action, two of the plaintiffs were sworn, and testified as witnesses in behalf of the plaintiffs, and this appeal was taken from the decision of the clerk in respect to their right to witness-fees for such attendance.

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

—This is an appeal from the taxation or adjustment by the clerk of the plaintiffs’ costs in this action. Two of the plaintiffs, Seckel Bronner and Bernhard Bronner, attended and were sworn on the trial of this action, as witnesses for the plain*184tiffs; and the plaintiffs claimed to he allowed, in their bill of costs, nihe dollars for the attendance of Seckel Bronner, and fifty dollars and eighty-eight cents for the attendance of Bern-hard Bronner, including his travel fees in coming from Syracuse to New York, to attend the trial, and returning.

The objection is taken, on the part of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Logan v. ThomasNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Cornell v. PotterNew York Supreme Court · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API