Legal Opinion
Bartlett v. PHILIP-CAREY MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1965PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dyer
Complainant-appellee, R. H. Bartlett, instituted this action to recover of defendant-appellant, Philip-Carey Manufacturing Company, the amount of $1,901.42 allegedly due as premium commissions for sales consummated from January 1,1962 through May 31,1962, while the former was in the latter’s employ. The cause was heard on bill and answer and a decree entered in favor of complainant for the amount sought. The cause is here on agreed stipulation of facts and a brief review of the facts will be helpful.
Complainant, for a number of years, had been employed by defendant as a salesman receiving his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Petty v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
- Home Beneficial Ass'n v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
- Weatherly v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
- Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Ætna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. BidwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Blaylock & Brown Construction, Inc. v. AIU Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- Highlands Wellmont Health Network, Inc. v. John Deere Health Plan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Humphries v. West End Terrace, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- Coble Systems, Inc. v. Gifford Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
- Highlands Wellmont Health Network, Inc. v. John Deere Health Plan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.