Legal Opinion

Isaac N. Daubmyre & American Surety Co. v. Hunter

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 30, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The American Surety Company became surety on a supersedeas for $10,000.00 given to comply with an order of the Court reading as follows:

‘ ‘ THIS CLAUSE coming on to be heard upon the application of the complainant for an order of supersedeas from the final decree and judgment entered in this cause on January 30th, 1922, and to fix the conditions of the bond to be given, and the said final decree and judgment being other than a money judgment and the court believing that the said application for a supersedeas should be granted, and counsel for both parties agreeing that a bond of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Halie v. WickershamSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. McMichael v. Eckman & VestburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
  4. Tapping v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  2. Poling v. City Bank & Trust Company of St. PetersburgDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Kahn v. American Surety Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. City of Jacksonville v. Brentwood Golf Course, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Gore v. News-Journal Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API