Legal Opinion

Gamble v. Emery

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 31, 1923No. 11324PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion toy

ESTES, C.

Plaintiffs Gamble and Sewell sued the defendant, Emeryii in the county court 'of Pittsburg county for conversion of fruit from a certain orchard and for the use of one certain house and for the value' of certain fences, which fences were alleged to have been destroyed by the defendant, Emery. Plaintiffs alleged that they were the owners'- Of the orchard, the house, and the fences, and that all of same were located on certain Segregated coal lands, which lands belonged to the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations. As a'muniment of their title to said orchard and house, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Long v. ShepardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  4. Wade v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  5. Bracken v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wentz v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API