Legal Opinion

Bodenheim v. Lightfoot

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1910No. 2206PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Original application to the Supreme Court by the Mayor of Long-view for writ of mandamus against the Attorney-General.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gaines

The city of Longview, having 1:97 tax unlevied out of the fifteen cents per hundred dollars, authorized by the Constitution for the construction of roads and bridges and other public improvements, determined to issue bonds for such sum as the unappropriated part of the fifteen cents would justify. The city council passed a resolution to that effect and presented the bonds to the Attorney-General for approval. He disapproved the same, and hence, the city council passed a resolution authorizing the mayor to bring suit to compel him to approve the bonds. This suit was brought in pursuance of…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Austin Bros. v. PattonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Lasater v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Austin Bros. v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Broussard v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API