Legal Opinion

Wool v. . Bond

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Civil aotioN, tried at Fall Term, 1894, of Chowan Superior Court, before Graham, J., aud a jury. There was a veidict for the defendant, and from the judgment thereon, plaintiff appealed. The facts are concisely stated in the opinion of Associate Justice Clare.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

The sole inquiry in this action was whether the land sued for was the same as that described in the pleadings and judgment in a former action brought by the defendant in this case against the plaintiff herein, which was tried at fall term, 1892, of the same court, the judgment in that action being pleaded asan estoppel. All the plaintiff’s witnesses, who professed to know, testified that the laud in question was the identical land embraced in the pleadings and judgment in such former action, and all the witnesses for the defendant testified to the same effect, and three of these…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . RileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Humphrey v. Board of Trustees of Front Street Methodist Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Holden v. . PurefoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Fleming v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Chemical Co. v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anniston National Bank v. School Committee of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Anders v. . GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Bank v. . School CommitteeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Roberts v. . DaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Aiken v. Lyon.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API