Legal Opinion

Friedman v. District Court

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1980No. 4004Published

1Opinion of the Court

611 P.2d 77 (1980)

Martin FRIEDMAN, Appellant,

v.

DISTRICT COURT, Appellee.

No. 4004.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

May 16, 1980.

Martin Friedman, in pro. per.

Bruce M. Botelho, Asst. Atty. Gen. and Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and CONNOR, BOOCHEVER, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ.

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

Appellant Friedman is an attorney at law. He appeals from three contempt orders concerning his manner of dress during appearances in court.

The first incident occurred on January 11, 1977, before Superior Court Judge James A. Hanson, then sitting as a district court…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. La Rocca v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Breese Ex Rel. Breese v. SmithAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Sandstrom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  5. Peck v. StoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API