Legal Opinion
Cook v. Little Caesar Enter
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 24, 2000No. 99-1163Published
1Opinion of the Court
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION 12 Cook, et al. v. Little Caesar Enterprises No. 99-1163 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 ELECTRONIC CITATION:
2000 FED App. 0147P (6th Cir.)
File Name: 00a0147p.06 Michigan courts have held that to maintain a cause of action for tortious interference, a plaintiff must establish that defendant was a “third party” to the contract or business relationship. See Reed v. Michigan Metro Girl Scout Council, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
201 Mich. App. 10, 12
(Mich. Ct. App. 1993). FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT The district court properly held that, because the franchise…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Terry Barr Sales Agency, Inc. v. All-Lock Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- American Anodco, Inc. And American Bumper & Manufacturing Company, Inc., Cross-Appellants v. Reynolds Metals Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Reed v. Michigan Metro Girl Scout CouncilMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.