Legal Opinion

Toyota Motor Credit Corp. v. Montano (In Re Montano)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 22, 1996No. 19-12479PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

PAUL MANNES, Chief Judge.

Before the court is a motion for default filed on behalf of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation against the debtor, Mirian K. Mon-tano. Because the affidavit is insufficient in form and substance, the motion will be denied.

Defaults are governed by Bankruptcy Rule 7055 that makes Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure applicable in adversary proceedings. Bankruptcy Rule 9014 also makes Bankruptcy Rule 7055 applicable in contested matters. The Supplementary Note of the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules regarding Rule 55 points out,

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Engstrom v. First National Bank of Eagle LakeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Young v. Higbee Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Ledwith v. StorkanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
  4. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. In Re A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Debtor. Alice Anderson, Claimant-Appellant v. Dalkon Shield TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allfirst Bank v. Lewis (In Re Lewis)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2001
  2. Target National Bank v. Redmond (In Re Redmond)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
  3. Gillespie v. SachseDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
  4. Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Majors LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2024
  5. Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Edsel’s Club, LLC d/b/a Edsel’s Club et al.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API