Bloom v. Christensen

(dissenting) — In my opinion, the earnest money receipt which the parties signed, and which is set forth in the majority opinion, did not embody the complete agreement between the parties. The document thrice refers to a contract to be later executed. The second reference to such a contract reads as follows: “The property is to be conveyed by contract of sale and warranty deed . . . ” The receipt itself refers to the following matters which were to be subject to later agreement:

“Taxes and assessments that are a lien on the property, if not assumed by the purchaser, will be adjusted when the…