Feyz v. Mercy Memorial Hospital

I concur with many of the results reached by the majority opinion. Specifically, I agree that, because MCL 331.5311 establishes qualified immunity for peer *692review entities and participants, there is no justification in this state for recognizing the judicial nonintervention doctrine. I also agree that the judicial nonintervention doctrine should not be applied to a private hospital’s general staffing decisions. I disagree, however, with the majority’s conclusion that the term “malice,” as used in MCL 331.531, should be defined under the principles of “actual malice” in accordance with…