Legal Opinion
Robinson v. New Jersey Mercer County Vicinage-Family Division
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 15, 2013No. 12-2429UnpublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The pro se appellant, Albert Robinson, seeks review of the District Court order that dismissed his complaint and denied several pending motions as moot. We will affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand for further proceedings.
I
Robinson, a Florida resident, filed a complaint in which he claimed that the preparation and execution of a final restraining order (FRO) violated his constitutional rights and otherwise amounted to tortious behavior. 1 Named as defendants were: 1) the Family Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Mercer Vici-nage; 2) Sandra Terry, the manager/director…
3Cases cited22 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Kelley Mala v. Crown Bay MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Great Western Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by27 opinions
- Shawe v. PincusDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2017
- DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE -TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21-cv-7895District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- Ajay Kajla v. Patricia ClearyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Angel Lopez and Kazue Koizumi v. The Clerk of the New Jersey Appellate Division, in his/her official capacity, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- BAQUERO v. MENDOZADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.