Legal Opinion

King v. Central Hardware Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 3, 1920No. 4 Div. 876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari to- Court of Appeals. Action by the Central Hardware Company against A. G. Anderson for rent and advances, in which attachment was levied upon certain real property which was claimed by Henry King. On second trial of the claim suit, there was judgment for plaintiff (85 South. 821), and claimant brings certiorari.

1Per curiam

This court is of the opinion that the trial court committed error in admitting the record of the judgment recovered by plaintiff against defendant. Taliaferro v. Lane, 23 Ala. 369; Abraham v. Nicrosi, 87 Ala. 173, 6 South. 293. This question was not raised or adjudicated in this case on the former appeal. 200 Ala. 209, 75 South. 967.

Reversed and remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings in conformity herewith.

All (the Justices concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Abraham v. NicrosiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Taliaferro v. LaneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  3. King v. Central Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Mobile v. LartigueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Baker Tow Boat Co. v. LangnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. King v. Central Hardware Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1919