Sprague v. Clay County Use School Districts.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). The second surety bond was required to be furnished by the depository bank upon a demand therefor by the county judge under the authority of act 163 of 1927, § 14, of which reads in part as follows:
‘ ‘ The county court, or the judge thereof, may at any time, if he deems it desirable, require a new bond, or additional bond to be filed by any depository selected under this act.” The county judge demanded the execution of the new bond because of having heard of the opinion of the Attorney General that the law required it, and since most of the county…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- Jefferies v. WassonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- State Use Randolph County v. Pocahontas State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- School District No. 4 v. McCrarySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Talbot, ex parteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877