Legal Opinion

Kiker v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1936No. 2 Div. 592PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

The charge was instituted in the county court by affidavit charging that the defendant had in his possession prohibited beer, which affidavit ended with the words “according to law.” On appeal the solicitor filed complaint which charged that the defendant “within twelve months before the Commencement of this prosecution did have prohibited beer in possession contrary to law, etc.” Demurrers were interposed to the complaint, which demurrers were overruled.

The objections raised to the affidavit and the complaint of the solicitor are hypercritical. The affidavit specifically…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barnewall v. MurrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Eiland v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  3. Dupree v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  4. Felix v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  5. Craven v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Woodham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Kiker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Collins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Kitsos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Porter v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API