Legal Opinion

Ex Parte King

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 3, 1989No. 87-1134PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted certiorari to consider whether the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in holding that the municipal court acted outside its authority in treating Christopher Allen King as a youthful offender pursuant to Ala. Code 1975, § 15-19-1 et seq. (the "Youthful Offender Act").

For a detailed statement of the facts, see King v.Wooldridge, 547 So.2d 576 (Ala.Crim.App. 1988).

Reasoning that the crime with which King was charged is a misdemeanor and, therefore, that the Youthful Offender Act had no application, the Court of Criminal Appeals held that the municipal court lacked the authority to treat…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Norris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Gunn v. City of BirminghamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. Corum v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Ex parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Gandy v. City of BirminghamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crauswell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  2. State v. ShaverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  3. Pressey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  4. King v. WooldridgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API