Legal Opinion

Scott v. Raymond

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 24, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Freeborn county,Farmer, J., presiding, refusing a new trial, after a verdict of $271, for defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtYandebburgh, J.

This action is brought by plaintiff to recover a balance clue upon contract for the sale and delivery of 1,000 barrels of apples, at an agreed price of $3,000. The complaint alleges the delivery of the apples, which the answer admits, and no other issue is raised by the pleadings, except that the answer alleges that the contract for the sale of the apples — which was not in writing— contained a stipulation amounting to an express warranty of the quality of the goods agreed to be furnished under it by plaintiff, and also a breach thereof, and claims damages, for which it sets up a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Day v. . PoolNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Mandel v. ButtlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  3. Haase v. NonnemacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cosgrove v. BennettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Halley v. FolsomNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Felsenthal v. HawksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API