Legal Opinion

Yerkes v. Dangle

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided April 30, 1943No. 78PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Speakman, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The judgment in this case was entered pursuant to the authority of the first paragraph of Section 4580 of the Code of 1935, which provides that: “If the defendant in a writ of summons, shall not appear at the return day thereof; and it shall appear by the return that he was duly summoned, it shall be lawful for the plaintiff, having filed his declaration, to take judgment thereon for default of appearance, according to the rules and practice of the court.”

The second paragraph of said Section, and also Section 4279 of the Code require some…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miles v. LaytonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
  2. Anaconda Mining Co. v. SaileMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Logan v. SouthallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Brown v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore R.United States Circuit Court · 1881
  5. Baugh & Sons Co. v. Crowell Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alexander v. HagedornTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Frank G.W. v. Carol M.W.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Kaiser-Frazer Corp. v. EatonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953
  4. Spriggs v. GoodrichWyoming Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Vechery v. McCabeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API